Personnel Security and Executive Protection

Common Mistakes in Executive Protection

Like common individuals, highly qualified executive protection representatives make mistakes. Once they are assigned in the field they are on high alert along the way, no matter who their client is, it is a matter of life and death until they are declared to abort. The entire period while handling the situation is surely at risk for both the client & the agents who are assigned, so there is no room for mistakes in this kind of job because it’s a matter of security and anything can go wrong with a blink of any eye.

The fact remains the same with the serious nature of the executive protection, common mistakes that special agents make is part of our discussion, therefore we’re going to highlight some of them in this article.

First, executive protection comes with respect, which is the major issue among all security providers. If agent don’t pay respect to the client, it can be a big trouble for both parties. Respect is the only thing that will never drive you angry. Go-ahead test it, you’ll know.

Second mistake that security representatives make is befriending their clients; It is a natural inclination that one tends to become close friends with people they spend time with but, getting close to the client is highly negative approach. Fact of becoming close or befriending cannot be denied, it usually happens. But if you are having an ice-cream with your client during this sensitive span of time is highly irrespective.

Another mistake which is very common is getting involved in personal affairs; meaning, keeping a reasonable distance and not prioritize the client in any way possible. For example, if the client is visiting a food restaurant while you have the assignment of his or her protection, you have to keep a discrete distance of about 500 meters from their conventional meeting and go by the book.

Similarly, bodyguards taking advantage of clients in any manner, creates bad impact on the official relationship. On the other hand, if the security person is being dishonest and avoiding any sort of facts, it would result into disavowing the assigned agent soon.

Favoritism is a big problem among security providers. This leads to unprofessionalism. If the service providers are giving unfair preferences one individual at the expense of the other, this sort of treatment does not look appealing at all.

No one is perfect in this world. This is the reason why these common mistakes also lie in the security providing agencies especially, with the executive protection service that can be prevented. Level of executive security protection maybe slightly below the priority of the president but it has its own value that initiates client-handling skills. On that note professionalism and efficiency are deemed to be emerged only if each precautionary measure is satisfied and that’s all a client’s wish.

Advance Planning

You begin with a blueprint. Personal security and executive protection don’t come easy, you must a plan before making an advance for executive protection mission. If you’re asking the right questions, there you’ll have a perfect meeting to come fourth with the right examples. The precise example is a survey report in which you need to discuss key objectives of planning a protection duty. In the report you have got to mention smallest detail in key figures, like what location you will be making an advance? What are the risks due travel and transportation? Are there any prior threats to cope with at public event and happenings near five-star hotels and restaurants?

One’s strategy in executing a protection mission wants absolute clarity. Raising those questions above might give it an excellent shot to begin with and making good decisions for an orderly enhanced plan for both, as a personal security or as an executive protection agent. Before going into the field do the survey and report to the higher authorities to make your advance planning process worthy of execution.

Client Profile

Executive protection measures revolve around four pillars of protocol defense. Those are risk, intelligence, advance, and location. On these bases you will be able to develop a sound profile of your client or VIP. On occasions due to the aggressive nature of the client risk arrives, threats are even greater during the whole protection process.

The price of failing in the mission isn’t pretty. Therefore, you must seek answers to these questions.

· Determine what is at stake?

· How to get aligned for causes of endanger

· How to point-out level of Influence client has on masses

· Why Pre-determine Sudden Encounters and Maneuvers

· Avoid Personalizing the experience or making them feel special

· Always remember an executive has a limited time

All this would rather, be achieved by speaking out to the client, though being as brief and as precise about your tactics as you can is your basic idea here, to get the job done smoothly and flawlessly.

Armed and Unarmed Protections

Personal protection specialists are faced with a myriad of temptations, especially spilling their client's secrets, but in the face of all that stands their oath, that makes them the "Keeper of Secrets" of their client.

The ethical obligations of a personal protection specialist for their client greatly exceed those of most other professions. It can be tempting to "sell off" or simply "share" what your client does; the former can earn you some extra cash, and the latter can earn you some popularity.

However, you must know that depending on what you know, you have the ability to destroy a client's brand, career, and life simply because you have access to your client and their secrets and what takes place in their life when they aren't in public. This, of course, includes the good, the bad, and the ugly.

So, how can you resist the temptation to divulge your client's secrets?

A personal protection specialist swears under oath to keep secret and confidential everything they learn about the client they are working for, which is why they must be more conscious of their duty to safeguard the client from harm. They can do this by refraining from sharing information with reporters and on social media.

Emerging Technologies

One emerging technology that could be used to enhance a personal protection assignment is the use of drones. Drones can be used for surveillance and reconnaissance and can be equipped with cameras and other sensors to provide real-time information about a potential threat. Drones can also be used to deliver a message or package to a protected individual, or to aid in an emergency situation. In addition, drones can be used to create a virtual barrier around a protected individual, making it more difficult for an attacker to approach them. In the personal protection field, drones can also be used for a number of other tasks, such as surveillance, reconnaissance, and delivery.

It is important to note that drones are not a panacea, and they must be used in conjunction with other security measures to be effective. For example, drones should not be the only source of information about a potential threat. Human intelligence and observation are still essential for identifying and assessing threats. In addition, drones can be intercepted or shot down, so they should not be relied upon as the sole means of protection. However, when used properly, drones can provide an extra layer of security that can make a personal protection assignment more successful.

When selecting a drone for a personal protection assignment, it is important to consider the specific needs of the assignment and the environment in which it will be operated. For example, if the assignment is taking place in an urban area, then a smaller drone that can maneuver through tight spaces may be more appropriate than a larger drone that is better suited for open areas. In addition, the type of camera and other sensors that are installed on the drone should be selected based on the specific needs of the assignment. For example, if surveillance is the primary goal, then a drone with a high-resolution camera may be more appropriate than one with less powerful sensors.